Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2012; Volume 206, Supplement 691
Scandinavian Physiological Society's Annual Meeting
8/24/2012-8/26/2012
Helsinki, Finland


SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE OF VISUAL CONSTRUCTION TASK
Abstract number: P53

SLAVUTSKAYA1 AV, GERASIMENKO1 NYu, KALININ1 SA, MIKHAILOVA1 ES

1IHNA of RAS, Butlerova, Moscow, Russia

Background: 

It is well known that men typically perform better on tests of spatial ability than women. Some authors point out different strategies in decision of visual spatial tasks in men and women. The majority of electrophysiological studies connect gender differences in spatial abilities with cognitive stages of visual processing. Only few authors write about sex differences at early analysis. Method. In our study the sex differences in accuracy, reaction time (RT) and amplitude of the early P1 component of ERPs during recognition of whole and transformed objects. Transformation was a displacement of object details in radial direction and displacement in combination with rotation of details by different angle. Results. The accuracy decreased, and the RT increased parallel to the growth of the rotation angle in both genders. At the same time we found the significant sex differences in the early stage of visual processing. In men the P1 peak amplitude at P3/P4 sites increased significantly during the recognition of spatially transformed objects, and the wider the angle of rotation the greater the P1 peak amplitude. We did not found dependence of amplitude P1 on the rotation of details in women. We also revealed differences of P1 amplitude between correct and incorrect responses. Only in men the errors were connected with decreased P1 amplitude at P3/P4. Conclusion. The revealed gender differences of early visual processing may be the neurobiological basis of different spatial abilities in men and women. The study was supported by Russian Foundation Humanitarian RFH 12-36-01291a2.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2012; Volume 206, Supplement 691 :P53

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE