Back
Acta Physiologica 2010; Volume 199, Supplement 680
Abstracts for the 12th Symposium on Vascular Neuroeffector Mechanisms
7/24/2010-7/26/2010
Odense, Denmark
7 DAY TREATMENT WITH 3,4-DIHYDROXYFLAVONOL PREVENTS ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IN MESENTERIC ARTERIES FROM STREPTOZOTOCIN-INDUCED DIABETIC RATS.
Abstract number: 24
LEO1 CH, HART1 JL, WOODMAN1 OL
1School of Medical Sciences, Health Innovation Research Institute, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia
3', 4'-dihydroxyflavonol (DiOHF) prevents diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction in aorta; however, it is unclear whether it is vasoprotective in the microvasculature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treating diabetic rats with DiOHF (7 days, 1mg/kg per day, s.c) on mesenteric artery function. Superoxide levels, determined by lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence, were significantly increased in diabetic mesenteric arteries but treatment with DiOHF reversed that effect. ACh-induced relaxation of mesenteric arteries was assessed using wire myography. Diabetes significantly reduced the sensitivity to ACh and treatment with DiOHF prevented endothelial dysfunction (pEC50 diabetic, 6.86±0.12 vs diabetic+DiOHF, 7.49±0.13, n=11, p<0.05) in mesenteric arteries. When the contribution of nitric oxide (NO) to relaxation was eliminated by N-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 100 mM, Sigma, USA) and 1H-(1,2,4)-oxadiazolo(4,2-a)quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, 10 mM, Caymen, USA), the sensitivity to ACh was significantly decreased in the diabetic arteries (pEC50 diabetic, 6.63±0.15 vs normal, 7.14±0.12, n=12, p<0.05), and treatment with DiOHF had no effect (pEC50 diabetic, 6.85±0.12). Thus, DiOHF did not affect the contribution of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) to relaxation. When the contribution of EDHF was inhibited with the potassium channel blockers, 1-[(2-chlorophenyl)(diphenyl)methyl]-1H- pyrazole (TRAM-34,1 mM, Sigma, USA), apamin (1 mM, Sigma, USA) and iberiotoxin (100 nM, Sigma, USA), the maximum relaxation (Rmax) to ACh was significantly decreased in diabetic arteries (Rmax diabetic 31±9 vs normal, 68±10, n=89, p<0.05), suggesting that diabetes impaired NO activity but DiOHF treatment prevented that effect (Rmax diabetic+DiOHF 69±6, n=11). Treatment with DiOHF in normal rats had no effect on superoxide levels or endothelial function. DiOHF treatment prevents endothelial dysfunction by preserving NO activity.
To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2010; Volume 199, Supplement 680 :24