Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2007; Volume 191, Supplement 658
Joint Meeting of The Slovak Physiological Society, The Physiological Society and The Federation of European Physiological Societies
9/11/2007-9/14/2007
Bratislava, Slovakia


PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO HAND AND FOOT DYNAMIC EXERCISE IN HEALTHY YOUNG MEN
Abstract number: PW07-51

Al-Kubati1,2 M., Fiser1 B., Geas3 A.H., Al-Mahmodi4 N.A.

1Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
21stInternal Cardiovascular Clinic in St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
3Dept. of Paediatric Radiology
4Dept. of Functional Diagnostics and Rehabilitation [email protected]

Aim: 

to investigate responses to hand (H-Ex) and foot (F-Ex) exercise regarding blood pressure (BP).

Methods: 

in 15 healthy men (30 ± 5 years) we used non-invasive methods for measuring systolic, diastolic, pulse and mean BP (SBP, DBP, PP and MBP), R-R interval and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Each measuring lasted 5 minutes and was repeated three-times all in standing position: once without exercise, once using dynamic handgrips (40 handgrips in 2 min.) and once during foot exercise by raising the heels to stand on the tip-toes on a 5 cm. high stair (40 times in 2 min.).

Results: 

during H-Ex: R-R interval decreased from 660 ± 29.8 to 652.5 ± 39.2 ms, p = 0.7 non-significant (NS), SBP, DBP, PP and MBP (in mmHg) increased from 109.9 ± 4.6 to 121.9 ± 10.4, p = 0.004; from 73.1 ± 2.7 to 81 ± 6.3, p = 0.02; from 36.8 to 40.9 (NS); and from 85.4 to 94.6, p = 0.007; respectively, BRS decreased from 5.73 to 4.0 ms/mmHg (NS). Comparing with F-Ex: R-R decreased to 631.9 ± 50.7 ms, (NS); SBP, DBP, PP and MBP (in mmHg) increased to 136.4 ± 14.1, p = 0.000001; to 86.1 ± 6.9, p = 0.0002; to 52.3, p = 0.0007; and to 103.6, p = 0.000008, respectively; BRS decreased to 2.7 ms/mmHg, p = 0.0001. Comparing H-Ex with F-Ex: we found no significant differences in R-R, DBP and BRS but greater SBP, PP and MBP in F-Ex: p = 0.0005, p = 0.008 and p = 0.005 were found respectively.

Conclusion: 

These results indicate that changes in R-R intervals, BRS and blood pressure are higher in F-Ex. We conclude that this exercise could be more helpful for subjects with orthostatic hypotension.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2007; Volume 191, Supplement 658 :PW07-51

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE