Chapter 6 - Absolute Population
Estimates by Sampling a Unit of Soil or Litter Habitat extraction
techniques.
The extraction methods
described here may be used not only with soils and aquatic
sediments but also with plant and animal debris, litter and dung,
plant material collected by suction apparatus or other means and
the nests of vertebrates. The actual methods for obtaining the
samples from these other habitats are discussed in Chapters 4 and
5. In general, the matrix holding the animals will be termed soil
if of terrestrial origin and sediment if of aquatic or marine
sample origin.
Much of the work in soil zoology was originally aimed at the
extraction of a large segment of the fauna by a single method.
However, most workers have now concluded that a method that will
give an almost absolute estimate of one species or group will
give at the most a rather poor relative estimate for another. Not
only does the efficiency of extraction vary with the animal, but
also with the soil (see table 6.1), the physical properties and
size distribution of its particles, its water content and the
amount of vegetable matter in it. Therefore, although with
certain animals under certain conditions each of these methods
will give absolute population estimates, none of them will
provide such data under all conditions. Further information on
ecological methods in soil zoology is given in Phillipson (1970),
Dindal (1990) and Gorny & Grum (1993). Techniques for sorting
animals from benthic samples are reviewed by Eleftheriou &
Holme (1984); McIntyre & Warwick (1984) and Hartley et al.
(1987).
Bees, cicindelid and Bledius larvae, certain crabs and other
comparatively large animals that make holes or casts in bare
ground or the seabed may be counted directly in situ. In most
studies, however, it is necessary both to take a sample and to
extract the animals.
| 6.1. Sampling 6.2. Bulk staining 6.3. Mechanical methods of extraction 6.4. Behavioural or dynamic methods 6.5. Summary of the applicability of the methods |
![]() |