The Russian Review

Edited by:
Eve Levin

---

For the last half-dozen years The Russian Review has reigned as a premier journal in Slavic Studies. Its prescient receptivity to cultural studies, its admirable emphasis on intellectual and scholarly quality, and its unusually rigorous adherence to publication schedules have made The Russian Review a model of academic scholarship and professionalism.  The Russian Review teems with stimulating, original insights, and invariably explores new ground.

TopNews and Announcements

Special Rate for American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (AAASS) Members

Members of the AAASS receive a reduced rate on a 2008 personal subscription.  Please visit the Subscribe / Renew page to take advantage of this rate today. 

For more details about the AAASS, please visit their website.  Information about membership options can be found here.


Electronic Archive
Back issues of The Russian Review are available electronically from JSTOR

TopHighlights

Changing Symbols: The Renovation of Moscow Place Names
Graeme Gill

Struggle over the Soviet Future: Science Education versus Vocationalism during the 1920s
Douglas R. Weiner
 
Sculptured History: Images of Imperial Power in the Literature and Culture of St. Petersburg (From Falconet to Shemiakin)
Svetlana Evdokimova

Napoleon Bonaparte and Apocalyptic Discourse in Early Nineteenth-Century Russia
Michael A. Pesenson

Negotiating the Limits of Religious Pluralism in Post-Soviet Russia:The Anticult Movement in the Russian Orthodox Church, 1990-2004
Emily B. Baran

Church Control over Marriage in Seventeenth-Century Russia
Daniel H. Kaiser

Fetishizing the Soviet Collapse: Historical Rupture and the Historiography of (Early) Soviet Socialism
Glennys Young

TopEndorsements

"Among the major Slavic journals worldwide, The Russian Review has a particular elegance and profile. It is interdisciplinary in a responsible way, seeking essays that not only criss-cross formerly separate fields....but also that educate new types of readers. for this to happen... there can be no narrow insidership: terms must be explained, background information must not be despised, and the level of writing must be uniformly accomplished and clear. This is the case with the Review: editing is always superb and standards for peer review fastidiously high... It is a place where important ideas are given the best possible chance to survive. "
Abraham Ascher, City University of New York