Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Edited by:
Andrew Miles

ISI Journal Citation Reports® Ranking: 2006: 29/56 (Healthcare Science & Services); 48/103 (Medicine, General & Internal); 11/20 (Medical Informatics)
Impact Factor: 1.263

---

The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice is a high quality international scholarly journal which is concerned with the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are articles on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including: 

• Evidence-based medicine
• Clinical practice guidelines
• Clinical decision making
• Clinical services organisation
• Implementation and delivery
• Health economic evaluation
• Health process
• Outcome measurement and
• New or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice.

TopNews and Announcements

Online content now available back to Volume 1
All back issues of this journal are available online by clicking here. For further information on how to access these articles please visit our Librarian Site.

Free Access in the Developing World
Free online access to this journal is available within institutions in the developing world through the HINARI  initiative with the World Health Organization (WHO).

 

Online Open

JECP now offers authors the opportunity to publish their papers via the Blackwells Online Open system. Authors who wish for their papers to be open access now have the option of paying for their papers to be published in print and online and thereby be made freely available for all to see. Please click here for further details.

TopHighlights

To view the editors pick of recently publsihed articles please click on the below links:

Medicine and evidence: knowledge and action in clinical practice
Andrew Miles, Michael Loughlin and Andreas Polychronis

Advancing a casuistic model of clinical decision making: a response to commentators
Mark R. Tonelli