Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2012; Volume 206, Supplement 693
Joint FEPS and Spanish Physiological Society Scientific Congress 2012
9/8/2012-9/11/2012
Santiago de Compostela, Spain


VISUAL CORTICAL FEEDBACK MODULATES LGN BURSTING IN THE DETECTION OF A NOVEL STIMULUS IN AN ATTENDED LOCATION.
Abstract number: P224

Rivadulla1 Casto, Ortuno2 Tania, Aguila3 Jordi, L Grieve4 Kenneth, Cudeiro2 Javier

1Neurocom, University of Corua-INIBIC,
2Neurocom, University of Corua-INIBIC,
3Neurocom, University of Corua-INIBIC,
4Life Sciences, University of Manchester

Objectives: 

The aim of this work was to study the effect of attention on the response of thalamic cells to a visual stimulus and the role of the corticofugal feedback on those attentional influences.

Materials: 

We recorded neuronal activity at the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of two awake behaving monkeys during a visual task. Animals were trained to signal, by a subsequent eye movement, a stimulus that was different within a group of four (three identical distractors, one target). One of the stimuli was always placed over the receptive field (RF) of the cell under test. We compared the response elicited by the presence of the target versus the distractor over the RF. This protocol was repeated during V1 blockade by repetitive transcraneal magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at low frequency (0.8Hz) for 4 minutes. Visually evoked spike trains were separated into two components: Spikes fired in bursts (defined as groups of 2 or more action potentials whose interspike intervals were <6ms, preceded by a non-firing period of at least 50 msec) and tonic spikes (defined as all other spikes).

Results: 

Spikes fired in bursts were significantly more numerous when the stimulus on the RF was the target rather than one of the distractors, (chi2 p<0.05). Furthermore the distribution of burst spikes was also different between conditions, appearing earlier and being more concentrated in time when the target is presented (Kolmogorov-Smirnov P <0.001). Blockade of corticofugal input by TMS decreased neuronal responses, with a more potent effect on spikes in bursts, effectively eliminating the difference between target and distractors (Kolmogorov-Smirnov P>0.5). Interestingly, with TMS the decrease in the number of burst correlated with an increase in the mistakes made by the animal in the task.

Conclusions: 

Thus, cortical afferents to the LGN appear to modulate thalamic "detection" of a relevant visual stimulus through a specific effect on spikes fired in bursts.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2012; Volume 206, Supplement 693 :P224

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE