Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2012; Volume 204, Supplement 689
91st Annual Meeting of The German Physiological Society
3/22/2012-3/25/2012
Dresden, Germany


THE INTERACTION OF CORONARY MICROEMBOLIZATION WITH REPERFUSION INJURY AND PROTECTION FROM IT
Abstract number: O66

Skyschally1 *A., Walter1 B., Heusch1 G.

1University of Essen / Medical School, Institute for Pathophysiology, Essen, Germany

Question: 

Timely reperfusion is mandatory to salvage ischemic myocardium. However, reperfusion per se induces additional damage and contributes to infarct final size. Ischemic postconditioning (PoCo), brief coronary re-occlusions at the onset of reperfusion, reduces infarct size. PoCo is also operative in humans, but has not become common use in clinical practice for fear that repeated mechanical manipulation of the culprit coronary lesion induces coronary microembolization (ME). Whether or not ME indeed interferes with PoCo is currently unclear.

Methods: 

We therefore investigated the consequences of ME at reperfusion using a clinically relevant model. Anesthetized, open chest pigs were subjected to 90 min coronary hypoperfusion followed by 120 min reperfusion, initiated with PoCo (n=8; 6 x 20s/20s reperfusion/re-occlusion) or as immediate full reperfusion (IFR; n=8). In two additional groups, ME was induced by intracoronary injection of microspheres (42m diameter; 3000 spheres/ml coronary inflow, as measured before ischemia) either during PoCo (PoCo+ME; n=8) or during IFR (IFR+ME; n=7). Area at risk, myocardial blood flow (microspheres), and infarct size (TTC) were determined.

Results: 

Area at risk and transmural blood flow during ischemia were similar among groups. ME per se increased infarct size (IFR+ME: 49±3% vs. IFR: 32±3%; % area at risk; mean±SEM; p<0.05; 2-way-ANOVA, LSD post-hoc tests). PoCo reduced infarct size without (PoCo: 21±3%; p<0.05 vs. IFR), but also with ME (PoCo+ME: 26±5%; p<0.05 vs. IFR+ME).

Conclusion: 

Obviously, ME at reperfusion is deleterious and increases infarct size. However, PoCo protects from reperfusion injury and reduces infarct size, even with concomitant ME. Therefore, PoCo is recommended for clinical use.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2012; Volume 204, Supplement 689 :O66

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE