Back
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 202, Supplement 685
Scandinavian Physiological Society's Annual Meeting
8/12/2011-8/14/2011
Bergen, Norway
NP POSTCONDITIONING PROVIDES MYOCARDIAL PROTECTION FROM ISCHEMIC INJURIES VIA RISK-AND BNP-RECEPTOR SIGNALLING
Abstract number: 8.1.20
JENSEN1 A, BREIVIK1 L, JONASSEN1 AK
1Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, 5009-Bergen Email: [email protected]
Background:
The influence and importance of B-type natriuretic peptide in acute myocardial infarction has for many years been ignored, and BNP has been underestimated as only a predictor of heart failure. Since it has recently been shown that exogenously administered BNP can reduce infarct size when delivered before, during and after ischemia, a study of BNPpostconditioning and mechanism in the ischemic myocardium was investigated.
Aim:
Determine whether postconditioning with BNP reduced infarct size compared to ischemic reperfused hearts and determine if natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A) and/or the RISK pathway is necessary for the protection.
Methods:
The Langendorff perfused rat heart subjected to 30 min of regional ischemia (RI) and 120 min of reperfusion were exposed to Ischemic Postconditioning (IPost) by 3 x 30 s of global ischemia and 3 x 30 s infusion of recombinant BNP as a postconditioning mimetic (BNPPost). Inhibitors of the RISK pathway (wortmannin (Wi), SH-6 and rapamycin (Rap) and NPR-A (isatin) were employed in order determine whether the activation of these pathways are required for BNP induced cardioprotection.
Results:
Compared to ischemia reperfusion, BNP postconditioning reduced infarct sizes by more than 50% (BNPPost 17 ±2% vs. Ctr 42 ±4%, p< 0.05). Co-administation of inhibitors the RISK pathway (Wi, SH-6 and Rap) or the NPR receptor (isatin) abrogated the cardioprotection, while the inhibitors by themselves had no effect on the size of infarct.
Conclusion:
BNP is protective as a postconditioning mimetic and relies on both NPR binding and RISK signalling.
To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 202, Supplement 685 :8.1.20