Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 202, Supplement 685
Scandinavian Physiological Society's Annual Meeting
8/12/2011-8/14/2011
Bergen, Norway


NP POSTCONDITIONING PROVIDES MYOCARDIAL PROTECTION FROM ISCHEMIC INJURIES VIA RISK-AND BNP-RECEPTOR SIGNALLING
Abstract number: 8.1.20

JENSEN1 A, BREIVIK1 L, JONASSEN1 AK

1Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, 5009-Bergen Email: [email protected]

Background: 

The influence and importance of B-type natriuretic peptide in acute myocardial infarction has for many years been ignored, and BNP has been underestimated as only a predictor of heart failure. Since it has recently been shown that exogenously administered BNP can reduce infarct size when delivered before, during and after ischemia, a study of BNPpostconditioning and mechanism in the ischemic myocardium was investigated.

Aim: 

Determine whether postconditioning with BNP reduced infarct size compared to ischemic reperfused hearts and determine if natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A) and/or the RISK pathway is necessary for the protection.

Methods: 

The Langendorff perfused rat heart subjected to 30 min of regional ischemia (RI) and 120 min of reperfusion were exposed to Ischemic Postconditioning (IPost) by 3 x 30 s of global ischemia and 3 x 30 s infusion of recombinant BNP as a postconditioning mimetic (BNPPost). Inhibitors of the RISK pathway (wortmannin (Wi), SH-6 and rapamycin (Rap) and NPR-A (isatin) were employed in order determine whether the activation of these pathways are required for BNP induced cardioprotection.

Results: 

Compared to ischemia reperfusion, BNP postconditioning reduced infarct sizes by more than 50% (BNPPost 17 ±2% vs. Ctr 42 ±4%, p< 0.05). Co-administation of inhibitors the RISK pathway (Wi, SH-6 and Rap) or the NPR receptor (isatin) abrogated the cardioprotection, while the inhibitors by themselves had no effect on the size of infarct.

Conclusion: 

BNP is protective as a postconditioning mimetic and relies on both NPR binding and RISK signalling.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 202, Supplement 685 :8.1.20

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE