Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682
The 90th Annual Meeting of The German Physiological Society
3/26/2011-3/29/2011
Regensburg, Germany


TRANSPORT RATE OF THE P-GLYCOPROTEIN (PGP) IS DEPENDING ON CHIRALITY OF THE SUBSTRATE
Abstract number: P219

*Thews1 O., Biesalski2 B., Yilmaz2 B., Rosch3 F., Fellner3 M.

Question: 

The p-glycoprotein (Pgp) actively transports many diverse substrates out of tumor cells leading to a multidrug resistant phenotype. Since some of these substrates have complex structures the question arises whether the chirality of the molecule has an impact on Pgp-mediated transport and therefore affects the distribution of these drugs in vivo.

Methods: 

The study was performed using a 68Ga-labeled tracer (the Schiff'base ligand complex [68Ga]MF6.MZ) which acts as a substrate of Pgp. During Ga-complexation the molecule forms two stereoisomers which can be separated by HPLC. The Pgp-transport rate was measured in vitro by tracer uptake into tumor cells. In vivo distribution was assessed in tumor-bearing animals in which the tracer concentration was determined in various organs 60 min after i.v. injection.

Results: 

The intracellular concentration of the (+)-[68Ga]MFL6.MZ-isomer was markedly lower than for the (-)-isomer indicating that the (+)-ligand is transported more efficiently. Adding excess amount of the unlabeled compound increased the intracellular tracer concentration as a result of a substrate competition. In vivo biodistribution showed that the concentration of the (+)-isomer was higher in most tissues (however not in the liver). Surprisingly the intratumoral concentration of the (+)-isomer was markedly higher in contrast to the results obtained in cell culture.

Conclusions: 

The results clearly show that the transport rate of the p-glycoprotein depends on the chirality of the substrate. The data also illustrate that cell culture experiments cannot be directly transferred to the in vivo situation because of other transport mechanisms (e.g., tissue perfusion) or different drug transporters (e.g., MRP1) which might play a role.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682 :P219

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE