Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682
The 90th Annual Meeting of The German Physiological Society
3/26/2011-3/29/2011
Regensburg, Germany


ACTIVITY OF UPPER LIMB MUSCLES DURING DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF HUMAN WALKING
Abstract number: P157

*Jing1 B., Kuhtz-Buschbeck1 J.P.

Introduction: 

During normal gait, both upper limbs move reciprocally, each arm swinging in phase with the contralateral leg. To find out whether arm swing is an active or a passive movement, the activity of arm and shoulder muscles was examined during different conditions of gait. If rhythmical activity persisted even when the arms are immobilized during walking, this might imply that the neural commands to arm and shoulder muscles are part of a centrally determined locomotor pattern, similar as in quadrupeds.

Methods: 

The activity of seven arm and shoulder muscles was studied with electromyography (EMG) in twenty volunteers during four conditions of treadmill walking: A) Normal gait with unrestrained natural arm swing; B) Held = volitionally holding the arms still during gait; C) Bound = walking with immobilized arms; D) Anti-Normal = walking with the arms swinging in phase with the ipsilateral legs.

Results: 

Arm swing was not an entirely passive pendular motion, but involved rhythmical activity of shoulder muscles. Co-contractions of shoulder extensor and flexor muscles with predominant extensor EMG activity were found in the Normal condition. Increased triceps activity prevented arm swing in the Held condition. Flexor and latissimus dorsi EMG signals were conspicuous in the Anti-Normal condition. Deliberate suppression (Held) and opposite-to-normal phasing of arm swing (Anti-Normal) involved stronger muscle activity than normal walking. Step-related rhythmical EMG signals of the ipsilateral deltoid, trapezius and latissimus dorsi muscles persisted when an arm was immobilized with a brace, suggesting the influence of a central motor pattern.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682 :P157

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE