Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682
The 90th Annual Meeting of The German Physiological Society
3/26/2011-3/29/2011
Regensburg, Germany


ATRIAL NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE INDUCES ENDOTHELIAL REGENERATION IN VITRO AND IN VIVO
Abstract number: P066

*Rahaus1 A., Volker1 K., Gassner1 B., Oberwinkler1 H., Kuhn1 M.

Cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) modulates arterial blood pressure (ABP) by activation of the guanylyl cyclase-A (GC-A) receptor and intracellular cGMP formation. Here we report a novel function of ANP as regulator of vascular regeneration. ANP (1 nM) significantly induced a 20% (at 24 hours) and 52% (at 48 h) increase in the number of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells at a low concentration of serum. This stimulatory effect was completely blocked by 8 mM Rp-8-Br-PET-cGMPs, an inhibitor of cGMP-dependent protein kinase I. To study whether ANP stimulates endothelial regeneration in vivo, we used a mouse model in which hind limb ischemia was induced by femoral arterial ligation. Blood flow recovery was assessed by Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging. ABP was measured by tail cuff plethysmography. Synthetic ANP (300 ng/kg BW/min) or vehicle was administered continuously via an osmotic minipump, which was implanted s.c. 3 d after the femoral artery ligation. In wildtype mice, ANP provoked a subtle, reversible drop in ABP by ~ 17 mmHg at 24 h and accelerated postischemic blood flow recovery compared to the vehicle-treated group. In mice with endothelial-restricted deletion of the GC-A receptor, the hypotensive effect of ANP was preserved, but the effect on blood flow recovery was abolished. Our study indicates that ANP not only regulates ABP but also exerts protective effects to enhance postischemic reperfusion and endothelial regeneration. Our observations suggest a therapeutical potential of ANP to treat peripheral arterial diseases refractory to conventional therapies. Supported by SFB 688

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682 :P066

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE