Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682
The 90th Annual Meeting of The German Physiological Society
3/26/2011-3/29/2011
Regensburg, Germany


NITRIC OXIDE-DEPENDENT MODULATION OF THE MYOGENIC RESPONSE IN THE RENAL CIRCULATION IN ENOS- AND NNOS-DEFICIENT MICE
Abstract number: O78

*Dautzenberg1 M., Keilhoff2 G., Just1 A.

Background: 

Nitric oxide (NO) blunts the myogenic response (MR) in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation. We aimed to clarify the role of neuronal NO-synthase (nNOS) of macula densa cells and endothelial NOS (eNOS) of the afferent arteriole in eNOS- and nNOS-knockout (ko) mice.

Methods: 

Autoregulatory mechanisms were assessed from the response of renal vascular resistance to small rapid changes of renal artery pressure (AP). The response within the first 6 s was interpreted as MR, from 6 to 25 s as tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF), and 25 to 100 s as third regulatory mechanism.

Results: 

In wild-type (wt) mice the three mechanisms contributed 36±3, 49±6, and 27±4 units to autoregulation. LNAME elevated AP +25±4 mmHg and reduced RBF -47±4%; MR was augmented and TGF and third mechanism blunted to 92±11, 14±3, and 2±4 units. nNOS-ko showed similar AP (85±2 vs. all wt 91±1 mmHg), RBF (11±1 vs. 12±1 ml/min/g), and autoregulation (38±4, 60±6, 34±5 units) as wt. LNAME induced similar changes of AP (+32±6 mmHg), RBF (-56±3%), and autoregulation (115±11, 21±6, -3±7 units). eNOS-ko were hypertensive (AP=110±4 mmHg), while RBF (12±1 ml/min/g) and autoregulation (35±5, 57±5, 26±11 units) resembled wt. However, LNAME failed to elevate AP (+1±1 mmHg), reduce RBF (+16±8%) or augment MR (autoregulation: 29±5, 47±12, 30±3 units).

Conclusions: 

NO-dependent modulation of MR in RBF autoregulation depends on eNOS, but not nNOS. In eNOS-ko mice MR is blunted by NO-independent means.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2011; Volume 201, Supplement 682 :O78

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE