Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2010; Volume 200, Supplement 681
Abstracts of the 61st National Congress of the Italian Physiological Society
9/15/2010-9/17/2010
Varese, Italy


X-RAY DIFFRACTION ESTIMATE OF THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF SUBFRAGMENT-1 AND -2 OF THE MYOSIN MOLECULE TO THE COMPLIANCE OF MUSCLE CROSS-BRIDGES
Abstract number: P95

RECONDITI1 M, LINARI1 M, PIAZZESI1 G, IRVING2 M, LOMBARDI1 V

1Laboratory of Physiology, DBE, Univ. of Florence, Italy
2King's College London, UK

In the X-ray diffraction pattern from skeletal muscle the 3rd order myosin-based meridional M3 reflection originates from the axial repeat of myosin cross-bridges along the thick filament. Changes in the intensity (IM3), spacing (SM3), and fine structure (RM3) of the M3 reflection in contracting muscle have been measured in many different protocols (Linari et al. PNAS97:7226, 2000; Piazzesi et al. Nature415:659, 2002; Reconditi et al. Nature428:578, 2004; Huxley et al. J. Mol. Biol.363:743, 2006). The results are explained with model simulations based on (1) the crystallographic structure of the myosin head (subfragment-1, S1), integrated with the tilting lever arm hypothesis (Rayment et al. Science261:50, 1993), (2) the presence of a fixed periodic mass attributed to detached myosin heads and (3) the assumption that all the compliance of the cross-bridges resides in S1 (Seebohm et al. Biophys. J.97:806, 2009). Here the possibility that a substantial proportion of the cross-bridge compliance is provided by the subfragment-2 (S2) link between the head and the thick filament (Knupp et al. J. Mol. Biol.390:168, 2009) is analysed by adding a variable compliance in S2 and testing the resulting model in the different protocols mentioned above and, moreover, against IM3 changes induced by rapid length changes imposed on the muscle fibre in rigor (Dobbie et al. Nature396:383, 1998). The results show that S2 does not significantly contribute to the cross-bridge compliance.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2010; Volume 200, Supplement 681 :P95

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE