Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2010; Volume 198, Supplement 677
Joint Meeting of the Scandinavian and German Physiological Societies
3/27/2010-3/30/2010
Copenhagen, Denmark


EXPRESSION STUDIES AND PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF VIP AND PACAP RECEPTORS IN THE CEREBRAL CIRCULATION OF THE RAT
Abstract number: P-TUE-8

BAUN1 M, OLESEN1 J, JANSEN-OLESEN1 I

Objective: Endogenous vasodilatory peptides VIP (vasoactive intestinal polypeptide) and PACAP (pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide) partially share receptors. Both VIP and the PACAPs activate the VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors, whereas the PAC1 receptor is dedicated to the PACAPs. Contrary to VIP, infusion of PACAP-38 in migraineurs causes a delayed-phase migraine-like attack. This difference calls for further investigation of the distribution and effect of the intracranial receptors for these peptides. Methods: The vascular effect of VIP, PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 was examined by wire myograph experiments on the isolated, precontracted middle cerebral artery (MCA) and basilar artery (BA) of the rat. The vasodilatory effect was challenged with peptide antagonists for the VPAC1 and/or VPAC2 receptors. Preliminary experiments were done with the pure PAC1 peptide agonist Maxadilan. mRNA expression of the receptors VPAC1, VPAC2 and PAC1 in the MCA, BA and middle meningeal artery (MMA) of the rat was examined by qRT-PCR. Results: VIP, PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 elicited comparable vasorelaxant action in isolated rat MCA and BA. Respective pEC50 MCA: 7.87±0.17, 7.88±0.12, 7.52±0.10, respective pEC50 BA: 8.31±0.27, 7.19±1.14, 7.81±0.17. PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 were equipotent in the two arteries, while VIP proved more potent in BA than in the MCA. The VPAC1 antagonist PG97-269 demonstrated more efficient blocking of the relaxant effects than the VPAC2 antagonist PG99-465 for all peptides in both vascular beds. The combination of the two antagonists blocked more efficiently than either alone. No marked dilatory effect was observed with the PAC1-agonist Maxadilan. qRT-PCR studies demonstrated that all 3 receptors were present in the tested vascular beds, but with the PAC1 receptor in relatively small amounts. Conclusion: Combined results indicate that the higher tendency of PACAP over VIP to cause headache is due to non-vascular effects.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2010; Volume 198, Supplement 677 :P-TUE-8

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE