Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 197, Supplement 675
Joint meeting of The Slovenian Physiological Society, The Austrian Physiological Society and The Federation of European Physiological Societies
11/12/2009-11/15/2009
Ljubljana, Slovenia


PECULIARITIES OF AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION IN MIGRAINE PATIENTS WITH INCREASED STRESS REACTIVITY IN HEADACHE FREE PERIOD
Abstract number: P183

Valevica1 Evita, Voita1,2 Daina, Jegere1 Daina, Vitols1 Andris, Zakke1 Anastasija

1Latvian University Institute of Cardiology
2Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy

There is lack of data about autonomic nervous system (ANS) function in migraine patients with increased stress reactivity. Migraine patients (female, mean age 29.3 ± 4.8 years, n=22) in headache free period and age and gender matched healthy controls (n=10) were tested at physical rest, during 10 s. precontraction period (mental stress), isometric contraction and recovery period. Heart rate (HR) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) were analyzed.

At rest 40 % of migraine patients (group M1) had increased HR comparing to controls (78.8 ± 8.4 vs. 77.1 ± 4.9 beats/min; NS). The rest of migraine patients (group M2) had significantly decreased HR comparing to control group (61.9 ± 5.6 beats/min; P=0.002). M1 group had statistically significant tendency to decreased BRS at rest comparing to control group (9.5 ± 2.3 vs. 15.0 ± 3.4 ms/mmHg) and statistically significant (P=0.004) difference comparing to M2 group 29.7 ± 10.1 ms/mmHg. In 10 s. precontraction period to M2 group HR statistically significant difference were stated comparing to other analyzed groups (70.7 ± 6.3 vs. 89.0 ± 3.6 vs. 84.2 ± 8.8 beats/min P=0.005). HR in M2 group during recovery period was significantly decreased comparing to controls and M1 group (61.6 ±5.9 vs. 76.0 ± 6.2 vs. 74.5 ± 9.5 beats/min; P=0.018).

It was concluded that M1 group had decreased parasympathetic activity. But patients of M2 group – increased parasympathetic activity. M1 group patients would be suitable for biofeedback trainings. Further investigation will be needed.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 197, Supplement 675 :P183

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE