Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 197, Supplement 672
The 60th National Congress of the Italian Physiological Society
9/23/2009-9/25/2009
Siena, Italy


THE LOW-FREQUENCY FLUCTUATIONS OF BLOOD PRESSURE ARE NOT BUFFERED BY THOSE OF HEART PERIOD DURING SLEEP: A PILOT STUDY WITH FIXED-RATE ATRIAL PACING IN RATS
Abstract number: P185

ZOCCOLI1 G, BASTIANINI1 S, BERTEOTTI1 C, FRANZINI1 C, LENZI1 P, LO MARTIRE1 V, SILVANI1 A

1Dip. Fisiologia umana e generale, Univ. di Bologna; (Italy)[email protected]

Aim: 

Spontaneous fluctuations of heart period (HP) do not buffer the low-frequency variability of blood pressure (LF-BPV) in supine humans in wakefulness. It is unclear whether this conclusion is valid in sleep, which impacts deeply on cardiovascular control.

Methods: 

To clarify this issue, we performed pilot studies on an outbred Sprague Dawley (r1) and an inbred Wistar-Kyoto (r2) rat. Rats were implanted with an arterial catheter and with electrodes for discriminating sleep states and for cardiac pacing. LF-BPV (standard deviation of mean blood pressure values due to fluctuations <0.8 Hz) was estimated in episodes of rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS) and non-rapid-eye-movement sleep (NREMS) longer than 60 s and compared between sinus rhythm and fixed-rate atrial pacing. Data are reported as mean±SEM (number of episodes).

Results: 

During NREMS, LF-BPV (mmHg) in r1 was 1.6±0.1 (296) in sinus rhythm and 1.6±0.1 (23) during pacing. In r2, corresponding values were 2.0±0.1 (294) and 1.9±0.1 (39). During REMS, LF-BPV (mmHg) in r1 was 3.9±0.3 (22) in sinus rhythm and 3.3±0.2 (18) during pacing. In r2, corresponding values were 5.1±0.4 (19) and 4.3±0.4 (5).

Conclusion: 

These data suggest that HP fluctuations do not buffer LF-BPV in sleep. In rats, baroreflex control of HP is known to be strongest in NREMS and overridden by central autonomic commands in REMS. Our data thus suggest that baroreflex control of HP is ineffective in buffering LF-BPV in NREMS, whereas central commands on HP may enhance LF-BPV in REMS.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 197, Supplement 672 :P185

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE