Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 197, Supplement 672
The 60th National Congress of the Italian Physiological Society
9/23/2009-9/25/2009
Siena, Italy


SHORT-TERM ARM IMMOBILIZATION MODULATES CORTICAL EXCITABILITY AND TRANSCALLOSAL INHIBITION
Abstract number: P11

BASSOLINO1 M, AVANZINO2 L, POZZO1 T, BOVE2 M

1IIT, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova
2Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Sezione Fisiologia Umana, Universit di Genova; (Italy)[email protected]

Introduction: 

Short-term arm immobilization has been shown to induce a reduction of cortical activity of motor areas (M1) in healthy subjects (Huber et al., 2006). In the present study, we investigated whether ten hours of arm immobilization are able to induce modification of cortical excitability of M1 in both the hemispheres and to modulate transcallosal interactions.

Methods: 

To this issue, five right handed subjects (2 males and 3 females, mean age=24.4±2.5 years) wore a soft bandage able to prevent any movement on their dominant arm, from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Motor evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curve from right and left first dorsal interosseus and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) both from left to right and right to left hemispheres were studied one day before and immediately after hand immobilization.

Results:

After immobilization MEP amplitudes decreased in the controlateral hemisphere, while they did not change in the ipsilateral one. Further, we observed a decrease of IHI from the controlateral to the ipsilateral hemisphere and a slight increase of IHI from the ipsilateral to the controlateral hemisphere.

Conclusions: 

Preliminary results show that ten hours of hand nonuse are able to reduce cortical excitability in the controlateral M1 and to modify the inhibitory interactions between hemispheres. These effects could be due to a decrease of both sensory afferent information and motor commands during the period of immobilization. Moreover, changes in interhemispheric inhibition could describe a "balance effect" between the two M1.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 197, Supplement 672 :P11

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE