Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 195, Supplement 667
XXXV Congress of The Spanish Society for Physiological Sciences
2/17/2009-2/20/2009
Valencia, Spain


WATCHING NEURONS LEARN: IN VIVO STUDIES IN TRANSGENIC MICE
Abstract number: S21

Delgado-Garcia1 JM

1Divisin de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain. [email protected]

Aim: 

The CNS is capable of transforming synaptic activities in order to register and to store learned information. Moreover, synaptic processes underlying learning should be observed at live -namely, at the very moment at which they are taking place. Synaptic plasticity can be evoked either by high frequency stimulation (HFS; Bliss and Lømo, J Physiol (Lond), 232: 331, 1973) or during the acquisition of new motor and cognitive abilities (Gruart et al., J Neurosci 26: 1077, 2006).

Methods and Results: 

Animals were implanted with chronic electrodes in selected hippocampal sites following procedures described elsewhere Gruart et al., J Neurosci 26: 1077, 2006). Both LTP and synaptic activity in learning evoke lasting changes in synaptic weights, and exhibit common properties such as input specificity, and associability. However, some questions regarding differences between HFS-induced LTP and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity remain unanswered. When LTP was evoked prior to conditioning, animals were unable to acquire conditioned eyeblinks if the training started 8 days after LTP disappearance, and no change was detected in fEPSP evoked at the CA3-CA1 synapse. In contrast, LTP-induced animals learned as did controls when the conditioning test was presented 20 days after LTP had decayed to baseline, and presented a normal increase in fEPSP slopes across conditioning. When evoked during the first two conditioning sessions, LTP prevented both eyeblink conditioning and fEPSP increase. LTP did not disrupt the normal performance of a recall test of a previously acquired eyeblink conditioning. Paired-pulse stimulation showed that, in opposition to synaptic activation during actual learning, LTP courses with a presynaptic disfacilitation. Studies carried out in different knock-in (TrkB), transgenic (APP, PS-1, TrkC), and other types of genetically manipulated mice were also studied.

Conclusion: 

Results offer new insights for the understanding of differential presynaptic changes taking place during LTP and during associative learning.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2009; Volume 195, Supplement 667 :S21

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE