Meeting details menu

Meeting Authors
Meeting Abstracts
Keynote lectures
Oral communications
Poster presentations
Special symposia
Other

Acta Physiologica Congress

Back

Acta Physiologica 2007; Volume 190, Supplement 655
XXXIV Congress of The Spanish Society for Physiological Sciences
7/3/2007-7/7/2007
Valladolid, Spain


ROLE OF ROS IN THE SENSIBILIZATION OF CB IN THE CHRONIC SUSTAINED AND CHRONIC INTERMITTENT HYPOXIA
Abstract number: O30

Gonzalez-Martin1 MC, Vega-Agapito1 MV, Agapito1 MT, Obeso1 A, Gonzalez1 C

1Departamento de Bioqumica y Biologa Molecular y Fisiologa/Instituto de Biologa y Gentica Molecular. Universidad de Valladolid/CSIC. Facultad de Medicina. 47005. Valladolid. Spain

Chronic hypoxia (CH) and chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) induce carotid body (CB) chemoreceptors sensitization. It has been suggested that reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to the genesis of this sensitization. CIH mimics sleep apneas, with the recurrent apneas-rebreathing mimicking ischemia-reperfusion episodes. Our aim was to determine the extent of CB sensitization in CH and CIH and define the significance of ROS in this process. We have used four groups of animals for each hypoxic situation: normoxic (control), hypoxic, and normoxic and hypoxic supplemented with an antioxidant diet. Hypoxia means 15 days in a 10-11% O2 atmosphere (CH) and 80s normoxia + 40s hypoxia (10-11% O2), 30 times/h, 8h/day (CIH). We monitored ventilation and CB catecholamine (CA) metabolism and several ROS-related parameters. CBs from CH rats have higher CA content, synthesis rate and turnover time; antioxidant supplementation in CH leads to a drop in a content, an increase in synthesis rate and a decrease in turnover time.

CBs from CH rats had an increased release response to acute hypoxic and high K+ tests, both in control and antioxidant-supplemented rats. CH increased ROS production and antioxidant supplementation reversed the pro-oxidant status to nearly normoxic levels. It is concluded that CH generates an status of oxidation that modifies CB CA-storing and synthesizing capacity but does not affect the sensitivity to hypoxia, indicating that ROS are not involved in the sensitization process observed in CH. Data from CIH would also be provided. Support: BFU 2004-06394, CIBER CB06/06/0050, FISS PI042462, JCyL VA045/04 and VA011C05

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Acta Physiologica 2007; Volume 190, Supplement 655 :O30

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience.You can find out more about our use of cookies in our standard cookie policy, including instructions on how to reject and delete cookies if you wish to do so.

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in our standard cookie policy .

CLOSE