Arthritis & Rheumatism, Volume 62,
November 2010 Abstract Supplement

Abstracts of the American College of
Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals
Annual Scientific Meeting
Atlanta, Georgia November 6-11, 2010.


Should Rheumatologists Retain Ownership of Fibromyalgia? A Survey of Ontario Rheumatologists.

Ghazan-Shahi,  Sassan, E. Towheed,  Tanveer, Hopman,  Wilma

Background:

Fibromyalgia is a controversial widespread chronic pain disorder that includes a wide constellation of somatic and emotional symptoms. This study surveyed the opinion of Ontario Rheumatologists with respect to their beliefs about the nature and management of fibromyalgia. A key objective was to ascertain if Rheumatologists should continue to be the main care providers for these patients.

Methods:

A survey questionnaire comprising 13 questions was sent electronically to all 150 Ontario Rheumatologists. The questionnaire was designed to obtain demographic data as well as opinions regarding different aspects of fibromyalgia. Data were analyzed descriptively and comparisons were made using chi-square tests.

Results:

A total of 80 respondents (58% male) completed our survey for a completion rate of 53%. The majority had completed their training in Canada (85%) and had been practising for more than 15 years (50%). 55% worked in University hospitals and 45% worked in the Community. Key findings were: (1) 71% believe that Rheumatologists should not retain ownership of fibromyalgia, (2) 55% believe that fibromyalgia is primarily a psychosomatic illness as opposed to a physical illness, (3) 60% are accepting new referrals for fibromyalgia, (4) 60% are managing patients with fibromyalgia, (5) 89% believe that the family physician should be the main care provider for these patients, (6) 31% usually consider psychiatric referral for these patients, (7) 79% recommend behavioural treatment methods, (8) 58% consider severe fibromyalgia to be a potentially disabling condition that warrants financial compensation through disability, (9) Rheumatologists who consider fibromyalgia to be a physical illness were also significantly more likely to believe that Rheumatologists should retain ownership of this disease (p=0.023). They were also more likely to accept new referrals for this disease (p=0.044), and also more likely to continue managing these patients in their practice (p=0.011).

Conclusions:

The majority of Ontario Rheumatologists do not wish to retain ownership of fibromyalgia. However, most of them continue to accept new referrals and continue to manage these patients, even though they believe that the family physicians should be the main care provider for patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatologists may be providing care to these patients primarily because this care is not available to them from their primary care physicians.

To cite this abstract, please use the following information:
Ghazan-Shahi, Sassan, E. Towheed, Tanveer, Hopman, Wilma; Should Rheumatologists Retain Ownership of Fibromyalgia? A Survey of Ontario Rheumatologists. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62 Suppl 10 :109
DOI: 10.1002/art.27878

Abstract Supplement

Meeting Menu

2010 ACR/ARHP